Hindustan Times, Press Trust Of India, New Delhi: India has an estimated
Image Link Flickr
was filed in compliance with the Supreme Court's direction seeking detailed information on the number of homosexuals in the country and how many of them are HIV infected. The governemnt submitted that there has been an overall reduction of HIV prevalence, HIV incidence (new infections) as well as deaths due to AIDS-related causes because of its AIDS control programme. Earlier, gay rights activists came out in support of decriminalisation of homosexual behaviour among consenting adults in private saying that it would help in bringing them in national mainstream. Naz Foundation, an NGO, working for the welfare and rehabilitation of HIV infected persons, submitted that criminalising gay sex will lead to preventing homosexuals come out in the open. "This population is hidden in the society and they are not available for getting proper health care facilities. There is a greater chance of the transmission of disease among them," advocate Anand Grover, appearing for the NGO, said. A bench headed by Justice G S Singhvi then asked him to place reports and studies done by experts to substantiate his arguments. In the last hearing on February 29, various social and religious organisations had vehemently opposed decriminalisation of gay sex saying that allowing such acts would lead to a "horrendous" situation. The Delhi high court had in 2009 decriminalised gay sex as provided in Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and had ruled that sex between two consenting adults of same sex in private would not be an offence. Section 377 (unnatural offences) of the IPC makes gay sex a criminal offence entailing punishment up to life term. The apex court is hearing petitions filed by anti-gay rights activists as also by political, social and religious organisations, which have opposed the high court verdict. Senior BJP leader B P Singhal, who had opposed in the high court the plea for legalisation of gay sex, has challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court, saying such acts are illegal, immoral and against ethos of Indian culture. Religious organisations like All India Muslim Personal Law Board, Utkal Christian Council and Apostolic Churches Alliance too have also challenged the high court's order. Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Right, Tamil Nadu Muslim Munn Kazhgam, astrologer Suresh Kumar Kaushal and yoga guru Ramdev too have challenged the high court verdict before the apex court. So has a Delhi-based social group Krantikari Manuvadi Morcha.'Source: Hindustan Times

